A study on creativity, gender, age and multiple intelligences in students of Compulsory Secondary Education in
Keywords:
creativity, age, gender, multiple intelligences, students.Abstract
In Education, it is important to know the potential of students to offer an educational response tailored to their needs. The objective of the article is to study the relationship between: creativity, gender, age and multiple intelligences. A quasi-experimental and correlational design was followed, applying a sample of 100 students of Compulsory Secondary Education (ESO), the RIBS Test of Runco, Plucker and Lim (2000-2001) for creativity and the Armstrong Multiple Intelligences Questionnaire (1999), along with age and gender. The results obtained verify that there are significant differences between creativity and multiple intelligences (IM) according to gender. And that there is a significant relationship between creativity and some of the multiple intelligences. As a conclusion, it is necessary to continue researching in order to offer an educational quality.
Downloads
References
Amabile, T.M. (1983). The social Psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45 (2), 357.
Antunes, C.A. (2006). Estimular las inteligenciasmúltiples. Qué son, cómo se manifiestan y cómo funcionan. Madrid, España: Narcea.
Armstrong, T. (1999). Las inteligencias múltiples en el aula. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Manantial.
Belmonte, V. M. (2013). Inteligencia Emocional y creatividad: factores predictores del rendimiento académico (tesis doctoral). Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, España.
Bennett, M. (1996). Men’s and women’s self-estimates of intelligence. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 411- 412.
Bennett, M. (1997). Self-estimates of ability in men and women. Journal of Social Psychology,137, 540-541.
Chan, D. W. (2001). Assessing giftedness of Chinese secondary students in Hong Kong: A multiple intelligences perspective. High AbilityStudies, 12(2), 215-234.
Chan, D. W. (2006). Perceived Multiple Intelligences Among Male and Female Chinese Gifted Students in Hong Kong: The Structure of the Student Multiple Intelligences Profile. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(4), 325-338.
Collard, P. y Looney, J. (2014). Nurturing Creativity in Education. European Journal of Education, 49 (3), 348–364.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998/2006). Creatividad. El Fluir y La Psicología del Descubrimiento y La Invención. Barcelona, España: Paidós.
De Zubiría, J; Marlés, R. y Ramírez, A. (2003). Prueba de creatividad: manual. Bogotá, Colombia: Instituto Alberto Merani.
Ferrando, M., Prieto, M., Ferrándiz, C., y Sánchez, C. (2005). Inteligencia y creatividad. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Psicoeducativa 7 (3), 21-50. Recuperado de http://www.investigacionpsicopedagogica.org/revista/articulos/7/espannol/Art_7_101.pdf
Gabrieli, J.D. (2016). The promise of educational neuroscience: Comment on “The practical and principled problems with educational neuroscience”. Psychological Review.
Gardner, H (1996). La nueva ciencia de la mente. Historia de la revolución cognitiva. Barcelona, España: Paidós.
Gardner, H. (2001). La inteligencia reformulada: Las inteligencias múltiples en el siglo XXI. Barcelona, España: Paidós.
Gardner, H. (2003). Inteligencias múltiples. La teoría en la práctica. Barcelona: Paidós.
Gil, R. (2007). Neuropsicología. Barcelona, España: Elsevier Masson
Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
Homsi, S.H.V. (2006). Temperamento e sua relação com estilos de pensar e criar [Temperament and its relationships with thinking and creating styles]. Unpublishedmaster’sdissertation. Pontificia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Howard-Jones, P., Varma, S. Ansari, D., Butterworth, B. De Smedt, B., Goswami, U., Laurillard, D., & Thomas, M. (in press). The principals and practices of educational neuroscience: Commentary on Bowers (2016). Psychological Review.
Humphreys, L. G. (1994). Intelligence from the standpoint of a (pragmatic) behaviorist. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 179-192
Navarro, J. (2008). Mejora de la creatividad en el aula de primaria (Tesis doctoral). Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, España.
Palomares, A., y García, R. (2016). Innovación y creatividad para favorecer la intervención educativa del alumnado con altas capacidades. Revista nacional e internacional de educación inclusiva 9 (1), 90-100.
Prieto, S. y Ferrándiz, C. (2001). Inteligencias múltiples y currículum escolar. Málaga, España: Aljibe
Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. y Lim, W. (2000–2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 393–400
Sánchez, C., Fernández, M. C., Rojo, A., Sainz, M., Hernández, D., Ferrando, M. y Prieto, M. D. (2008). Inteligencias Múltiples y Superdotación. Sobredotaçao, 9, 87-105.
Sisto, F. F. (2006). Teste de Raciocínio Inferencial - RIn. Manual. Sao Paulo: Vetor Editora Psicopedagógica Ltda.
Spearman, C. (1927). Las habilidades del hombre: su naturaleza y medición. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidós, MacMillan.
Sternberg, R.J. (1988). A three-facet model of creativity. The nature of creativity. Contemporary psychological perspective (pp. 125- 147). Cambridge University, Cambridge: MA.
Suazo, S.N. (2006). Inteligencias múltiples. Manual práctico para el nivel elemental. Puerto Rico: La Editorial Universidad de Puerto Rico.
Wechsler, S. M. (2009). Age and gender impact on thinking and creating styles. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 2 (1), 37-48.
Wright, B. y Stone, M. (1998). Diseño de mejores pruebas: utilizando la técnica de Rasch. México: CENEVAL.
Wyse, D. y Ferrari, A. (2015). Creativity and education: comparing the national curricula of the states of the European Union and the United Kingdom.British Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 30–47.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Editorial Committee Educational Praxis Magazine:
I hereby declare that I am the author of the article titled (article name), that it is original and my own and that it was not previously published in any other format or medium. I declare to know that the magazine will not charge me any type of fee under any circumstances, nor will I receive any type of monetary compensation If it were accepted for publication in Educational Praxis, I authorize the aforementioned magazine to publish it digitally and to advertise it on its social networks.
If the work is published, I adhere to the Creative Commons license called "Attribution - Non-Commercial Share Alike CC BY-NC-SA", through which it is allowed to copy, reproduce, distribute, publicly communicate the work and generate derivative works, as long as when the original author is cited and acknowledged. This license has been used since September 2018. In 2016 CC BY NC ND 4.0 was adhered to; and in the years 2017 and 2018 (January-August) CC BY NC 4.0.
This CC BY-NC-SA Share Alike license does not, however, permit commercial use of the work. As an author, the journal may establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal, it allows me to self-archive the published articles, in their post-print version, in institutional, thematic repositories, personal web pages or any other relevant use. with the recognition of having been first published in this journal.
Educational Praxis adheres to DORA (Declaration on Research Assessment) signed in San Francisco, California, on December 16, 2012, and to the Declaration of Mexico (Joint Declaration LATINDEX - REDALYC - CLACSO - IBICT).
3.png)
_(2).png)
2.jpg)
