La retroalimentación en la educación superior en países asiáticos: una aproximación
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19137/praxiseducativa-2024-280319Palabras clave:
retroalimentación, educación superior, países asiáticos, prácticas pedagógicas, estrategias de RetroalimentaciónResumen
El presente artículo de investigación da cuenta de la revisión documental sobre el uso de la retroalimentación en la educación superior en los países asiáticos. La metodología utilizada fue PRISMA, la que permitió seleccionar artículos en bases de datos, como Scopus, Taylor y Francis, Springerlink y Google Académico, publicados en el período 2017-2023. Se exponen los resultados del análisis de 51 documentos. Los hallazgos se organizaron en cuatro categorías: retroalimentación, tipos y métodos, impacto y eficacia, así como innovaciones y tendencias recientes. Los resultados destacan el papel de la retroalimentación en la mejora del aprendizaje de los estudiantes y revelan una diversidad de estrategias en la educación superior de los contextos asiáticos.
Descargas
Citas
Afify, M. K. (2018). The Impact of Interaction between Timing of Feedback Provision in Distance E-Learning and Learning Styles on achieving Learning Outcomes among Arab Open University Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 3053-3068.
Ajabshir, Z. F., & Ebadi, S. (2023). The effects of automatic writing evaluation and teacher-focused feedback on CALF measures and overall quality of L2 writing across different genres. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8(1), 26.
Al Harrasi, K. T. S. (2023). Reexamining feedback in the context of different rhetorical patterns of writing. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1), 4.
Al Qunayeer, H. S. (2020). Supporting postgraduates in research proposals through peer feedback in a Malaysian university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(7), 956-970.
Alkhammash, R. y Gulnaz, D. F. (2019). Oral corrective feedback techniques: An investigation of the EFL teachers' beliefs and practices at Taif university. Arab World English Journal, 10.
Álvarez, C. A. M. (2011). Cuantitativa y cualitativa Guía didáctica. https://www. uv. mx/rmipe/files/2017/02/Guia-didactica-metodologia-de-lainvestigacion. pdf.
Carless, D. & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Chan, C. K. Y., & Luo, J. (2022). Exploring teacher perceptions of different types of ‘feedback practices’ in higher education: implications for teacher feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(1), 61-76.
Chen, H., & Pan, J. (2022). Computer or human: a comparative study of automated evaluation scoring and instructors' feedback on Chinese college students' English writing. Asian Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1), 34.
Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Sustaining university English as a foreign language learners’ writing performance through provision of comprehensive written corrective feedback. Sustainability, 13(15), 8192.
Fouad, A. M. (2022). Oral Corrective Feedback Techniques: An Investigation of EFL Teachers' Beliefs and Practices in Sultanate of Oman in Post-Basic Schools. Online Submission.
Gan, Z. (2020). How learning motivation influences feedback experience and preference in Chinese university EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 496.
Gan, Z., & Yang, C. C. R. (2018). How prepared are the preservice ESL teachers to teach: Insights from university supervisor feedback. Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(1), 99.
Gan, Z., Hu, G., Wang, W., Nang, H., & An, Z. (2021). Feedback behaviour and preference in university academic English courses: associations with English language self-efficacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(5), 740-755.
Hassan, M. U., & Dzakiria, H. (2019). The University Students’ Beliefs towards Corrective Feedback in Learning English as Foreign Language in Pakistan. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 4094-4100.
Hassan, M. U., Aziz, A. A., & Pervaiz, M. (2022). Investigating Pakistani EFL Students’ Beliefs and their Impact on Written Constructive Feedback. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 6(3), 463-473.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112.
Hooda, M., Rana, C., Dahiya, O., Rizwan, A., & Hossain, M. S. (2022). Artificial intelligence for assessment and feedback to enhance student success in higher education. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022.
Jiang, L., & Yu, S. (2021). Understanding changes in EFL teachers’ feedback practice during COVID-19: Implications for teacher feedback literacy at a time of crisis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 509-518. Jin, X., & Ruan, Z. (2023). University Students’ Perceptions of Their Lecturer's Use of Evaluative Language in Oral Feedback. Linguistics and Education, 78, 101233.
Jin, X., Jiang, Q., Xiong, W., Feng, Y., & Zhao, W. (2022). Effects of student engagement in peer feedback on writing performance in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-16.
Kataoka, Y., Thamrin, A. H., Van Meter, R., Murai, J., & Kataoka, K. (2023). Investigating the effect of computer-mediated feedback via an LMS integration in a large-scale Japanese-speaking class. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1957-1986.
Leung, C., Davison, C., East, M., Evans, M. A., Liu, Y.-C., Hamp-Lyons, L., et al. (2018). “Using assessment to promote learning: clarifying constructs, theories, and practices,” in Useful Assessment and Evaluation in Language Education, eds J. Daviis, J. M. Norris, M. E. Alone, T. H. McKay, and Y.-A. Son, (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press), 75–91. Li, J. (2012). Cultural Foundations of Learning. East and West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Li, F., & Han, Y. (2022). Student feedback literacy in L2 disciplinary writing: Insights from international graduate students at a UK university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(2), 198-212.
Li, X., & Ke, P. (2023). Becoming Feedback Literate: A Case Study of a Chinese University EFL Teacher. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1-9.
Liu, Y. (2021). Understanding How Chinese University Students Engage with Teacher Written Feedback in an EFL Context: A Multiple Case Study. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 25, 84-107.
Londoño Palacio, O. L., Maldonado Granados, L. F., & Calderón Villafáñez, L. C. (2014). Guías para construir estados del arte.
Lau, S. L., & Sim, T. Y. (2020, November). Feedback of university students on online delivery learning during the COVID-19 pandemic period. In 2020 IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services (IC3e) (pp. 13-18). IEEE.
Lv, X., Ren, W., & Xie, Y. (2021). The effects of online feedback on ESL/EFL writing: A meta-analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 643-653.
Mahapatra, S. K. (2021). Online formative assessment and feedback practices of ESL teachers in India, Bangladesh, and Nepal: A multiple case study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 519-530.
Mahfoodh, O. H. A. (2017). “I feel disappointed”: EFL university students’ emotional responses towards teacher written feedback. Assessing Writing, 31, 53-72.
Man, D., Xu, Y., & O’Toole, J. M. (2018). Understanding autonomous peer feedback practices among postgraduate students: A case study in a Chinese university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(4), 527-536.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), 1006-1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
Nasir, S. A. M., Yaacob, W. F. W., & Ismail, N. (2019). The nature of online students' feedback in higher education. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 25(4), 377-392.
Ng, S. Y., Bong, C. H., Hong, K. S., & Lee, N. K. (2019). Developing an Automated Essay Scorer with Feedback (AESF) for Malaysian University English Test (MUET): A Design-based Research Approach. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 27(2).
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Pan, J., Chen, H., & Yuan, S. (2023). A comparative study of the engagement with written corrective feedback of Chinese private college students. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8(1), 18.
Patra, I., Alazemi, A., Al-Jamal, D., & Gheisari, A. (2022). The effectiveness of teachers’ written and verbal corrective feedback (CF) during formative assessment (FA) on male language learners’ academic anxiety (AA), academic performance (AP), and attitude toward learning (ATL). Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 1-21.
Phusavat, K., Paoprasert, N., & Suwanphiched, S. (2020). Roles of Students’ Learning and Motivation: Feedback and External Knowledge. In Blended Learning. Education in a Smart Learning Environment: 13th International Conference, ICBL 2020, Bangkok, Thailand, August 24–27, 2020, Proceedings 13 (pp. 90-98). Springer International Publishing.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Sakiroglu, H. Ü. (2020). Oral Corrective Feedback Preferences of University Students in English Communication Classes. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 172-178.
Salih, A. R. A. (2013). Peer Evaluation of Teaching or" Fear" Evaluation: In Search of Compatibility. Higher Education Studies, 3(2), 102-114.
Sheen, Y., & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 593-610). Routledge.
Shengnan, Q., Zhengxin, L., & Jingjing, L. (2020, April). Based on the OBE concept Research and Construction of University Academic Information Feedback Mechanism. In 2020 International Conference on Big Data and Informatization Education (ICBDIE) (pp. 430-434). IEEE.
Sun, P. P., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Effects of Translanguaging in Online Peer Feedback on Chinese University English-as-a-Foreign-Language Students' Writing Performance. RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 53(2), 325-341.
Tawafak, R. M., Romli, A. B., & Alsinani, M. (2019). E-learning system of UCOM for improving student assessment feedback in Oman higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 1311-1335.
Thi, N. K., & Nikolov, M. (2022). How teacher and Grammarly feedback complement one another in Myanmar EFL students’ writing. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(6), 767-779.
Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, B., Yu, S., & Teo, T. (2018). Experienced EFL teachers’ beliefs about feedback on student oral presentations. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(1), 1-13.
Wang, B., Yu, S., Zheng, Y., & Teo, T. (2022). Student engagement with teacher oral feedback in EFL university classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 13621688221105772.
Wang, F., Meng, F., Liu, S., Wang, S., Pan, L., & Lin, Z. (2022). Understanding Learners’ Metacognition of Online Teacher Feedback Amid COVID-19: A Case Study in a University Livestream Instruction Context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 861845.
Weng, F., Ye, S. X., & Xue, W. (2023). The effects of peer feedback on L2 students’ writing motivation: An experimental study in China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(4), 473-483.
Xu, J. (2021). Chinese university students’ L2 writing feedback orientation and self-regulated learning writing strategies in online teaching during COVID-19. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 563-574.
Xu, Q., & Yu, S. (2018). Action research on computer-mediated communication (CMC) peer feedback in EFL writing context. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27, 207-216.
Yanase, Y. (2023). Factors for the success of English writing classes using machine translation in university liberal arts and general education--from five perspectives: system, language ability, theoretical understanding, teaching materials, and feedback. Kyoto University Institute of International Higher Education Bulletin, 6, 19-50.
Yao, M., & Zhang, L. (2021). The Effects of Peer Feedback on L2 Students’ Writing Motivation: An Experimental Study in China. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1-11.
Yu, S., & Hu, G. (2017). Understanding university students’ peer feedback practices in EFL writing: Insights from a case study. Assessing Writing, 33, 25-35.
Yüksel, D., Soruç, A., & McKinley, J. (2021). Teachers’ beliefs and practices about oral corrective feedback in university EFL classes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 362-382.
Yuksel, D., Soruç, A., & McKinley, J. (2023). The relationship between university EFL teachers’ oral feedback beliefs and practices and the impact of individual differences. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 61(2), 387-414.
Zhao, Y., & Ellis, R. (2022). The relative effects of implicit and explicit corrective feedback on the acquisition of 3rd person-s by Chinese university students: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research, 26(3), 361-381
Zhan, Y. (2019). Conventional or sustainable? Chinese university students’ thinking about feedback used in their English lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.
Zhang, Y., & MacWhinney, B. (2023). Using diagnostic feedback to enhance the development of phonetic knowledge of an L2: a CALL design based on the unified competition model and the implementation with the Pinyin Tutor. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1), 35.
Zhao, Y., & Ellis, R. (2022). The relative effects of implicit and explicit corrective feedback on the acquisition of 3rd person-s by Chinese university students: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research, 26(3), 361-381.
Zheng, X., Luo, L., & Liu, C. (2023). Facilitating Undergraduates’ Online Self-Regulated Learning: The Role of Teacher Feedback. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(6), 805-816.
Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37, 13-24.
Zhu, Y., & Wang, B. (2019). Investigating English language learners’ beliefs about oral corrective feedback at Chinese universities: A large-scale survey. Language awareness, 28(2), 139-161.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Gustavo Adolfo Cardenas Messa, Martha Cecilia Giraldo Montoya, Fabio Nelson Giraldo Arcila, Natalia Sánchez Rendón, Leydi Jhoana Álvarez Carmona , Armando Zambrano Leal
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Nota de copyright
Comité Editorial Revista Praxis educativa:
Por la presente declaro que soy autor del artículo titulado (nombre del artículo), que el mismo es original y propio y que no fue publicado en ningún otro formato o soporte con anterioridad. Manifiesto conocer que la revista no me cobrará ningún tipo de tasa bajo ningún concepto, ni recibiré ningún tipo de compensación monetaria
Si el mismo fuera aceptado para su publicación en Praxis educativa, autorizo a la referida revista a publicarlo en forma digital y a publicitarlo en sus redes sociales.
Si el trabajo fuera publicado, adhiero a la licencia Creative Commons denominada “Atribución - No Comercial Compartir igual CC BY-NC-SA”, mediante la cual se permite copiar, reproducir, distribuir, comunicar públicamente la obra y generar obras derivadas, siempre y cuando se cite y reconozca al autor original. Esta licencia se utiliza desde septiembre 2018. En 2016 se adhirió a CC BY NC ND 4.0; y en años 2017 y 2018 (enero -agosto) CC BY NC 4.0..
Esta licencia CC BY-NC-SA Compartir igual no permite, sin embargo, utilizar la obra con fines comerciales. Como autor la revista podré establecer acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista me permite el autoarchivo de los artículos publicados, en su versión post-print, en repositorios institucionales, temáticos, páginas web personales o cualquier otro uso pertinente. con el reconocimiento de haber sido publicado primero en esta revista.
Praxis educativa adhiere a DORA (Declaration on Research Assessment) firmada en San Francisco, California, el 16 de diciembre de 2012, y a la Declaración de México (Declaración Conjunta LATINDEX - REDALYC - CLACSO - IBICT).
3.png)
_(2).png)
2.jpg)
8.png){kind=logo}
