About the interaction between the Rankülche indigenous community and archaeologists in the east-central area of La Pampa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19137/qs.v11i0.725Downloads
References
Anyon, R., T. Ferguson y J. Welch (2000). Heritage Management by American Indian Tribes in the Southwestern United States, en: McManamon and Hatton (ed.). Cultural Resources Management in Contemporary Society. Perspectives on Managing and Presenting the Past, Londres: Routledge, pp. 120-141.
APE (1997). Pampas del Sud. Recopilación de textos que hacen a las raíces autóctonas de la provincia de La Pampa. Santa Rosa: Subsecretaría de Cultura.
Benavides, H. (2005). Los ritos de la autenticidad: indígenas, pasado y el Estado ecuatoriano, en: Arqueología Suramericana, Vol. 1 (1), Colombia: Departamento de Antropología de la Universidad del Cauca, pp. 5-25.
Byrne, D. (1991). Western Hegemony in Archaeological Heritage Management States, en: History and Anthropology, Nº 5, Londres: Routledge, pp. 269-276.
Canhué, G. (2003). Reseña histórica de la Nación Mamülche, Pueblo Rankül (ranquel), habitante desde siempre del centro de la actual Argentina. Santa Rosa. Inédito.
Curtoni, R. (2004). La dimensión política de la arqueología: El patrimonio indígena y la construcción del pasado, en: Martínez et al (ed.). Aproximaciones contemporáneas a la Arqueología pampeana. Perspectivas teóricas, metodológicas, analíticas y casos de estudio, Olavarría: Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, pp. 437-449.
Curtoni, R. (2007). Arqueología y paisaje en el área centro-este de la provincia de La Pampa. Tesis de doctorado inédita. Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo.
Della Mattia, C. y N. Mollo (2002). Itinerario del viaje de Luis De la Cruz en la provincia de La Pampa”, en: Aguerre y Tapia (ed.), Entre Médanos y caldenes de la Pampa Seca, Buenos Aires: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, pp. 153-200.
Depetris, J.C. y P. Vigne (2000). Los rostros de la tierra. Iconografía indígena de la Pampa, 1870-1950. Santa Rosa, Ediciones de la Travesía.
Endere, M. y R. Curtoni (2006). Entre lonkos y “ólogos”. La participación de la comunidad indígena Rankülche de Argentina en la investigación arqueológica, en: Arqueología Suramericana, Vol. 2 (1), Colombia: Departamento de Antropología de la Universidad del Cauca, pp. 72-92.
Fernández Garay, A. (1998). Una ceremonia tehuelche entre los rankeles, en: Memorias de las Jornadas Ranquelinas, Santa Rosa: Subsecretaría de Cultura, pp. 111-117.
Gnecco, C. (1999). Multivocalidad Histórica. Hacia una Cartografía Postcolonial de la Arqueología. Santa Fé de Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes.
Gosden, C. (2001). Postcolonial archaeology: issues of culture, identity and knowledge, en: Hodder (ed.). Archaeological Theory Today, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 241-261.
Green, L., D. Green y E. Neves (2003). Indigenous knowledge and archaeological science: The challenges of public archaeology in the Reserva Uaçá, en: Journal of Social Archaeology, Vol. 3, (2), Londres: SAGE Publications, pp. 366-397.
Layton, R. (1989). Conflict in the archaeology of living traditions, Londres: Unwin Hyman.
Lowenthal, D. (1990). Conclusion: archaeologists and the others, en: Gathercole y Lowenthal (ed.). The Politics of the Past, Londres: Unwin Hyman, pp. 302-314.
Mamani Condori, C. (1989). History and Prehistory in Bolivia: what about the Indians?, en: Layton (ed.). Conflict in the archaeology of living traditions, Londres, Unwin Hyman, pp. 46-59.
Poduje, M. I., A. Fernández Garay, y S. Crochetti (1993). Narrativa ranquel. Los cuentos del zorro, Santa Rosa: Ministerio de Cultura y Educación de la provincia de La Pampa.
Preucel, R. y I. Hodder (1996). Comunicating Present Past, en: Preucel y Hodder (ed.) Contemporary Archaeology in Theory, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 3-20.
Robins, K. (1991). Tradition and translation: national culture in its global context, en: Corney y Harvey (ed.). Enterprise and Heritage. Crosscurrents of National Culture, Londres y NuevaYork: Routledge, pp. 21-44.
Ucko, P. (2001). “Heritage” and “Indigenous Peoples” in the 21st century, en: Public Archaeology 1, Londres: James & James (Science Publishers) Ltd., pp.27-238.
Watkins, J. (2000). Indigenous archaeology. American Indian values and scientific practice, Nueva York-Oxford: Altamira press, Walnut Creek-Lanham.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
When submitting their contributions, authors must declare that they have the permission of the file or repository where the documents that are attached to the work were obtained, whatever their format (unpublished manuscripts, images, audiovisual files, etc.). Such permission authorizes their publication and reproduction, releasing the journal and its editors from any liability or claim from third parties.
Likewise, authors must adhere to the Creative Commons license called "Attribution - Non-Commercial CC BY-NC-SA", through which the author allows copying, reproducing, distributing, publicly communicating the work and generating derivative works, as long as the original author is properly quoted and acknowledged. It is not allowed, however, to use the work for commercial purposes. Authors may establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with the acknowledgment of having been published first in this journal.
The publication of content in this journal does not imply any royalty or charge for taxpayers.
Quinto Sol adheres to the DORA (Declaration on Research Assessment) signed in San Francisco, California, on December 16, 2012, and to the Declaration of Mexico (Joint Declaration LATINDEX - REDALYC - CLACSO - IBICT).
4.png){kind=logo}
2.png)
_(2).png)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
