Between the reproduction of content and critical training: a critical discursive analysis of classroom interactions in the City of Buenos Aires
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19137/praxiseducativa-2024-280218Keywords:
pedagogical discourse; critical sociolinguistics; interaction; critical training; social order.Abstract
In this article, we investigate the modes of production and circulation of meaning in the educative practices developed in classroom contexts at the secondary level, in a school in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires. From the approach of critical sociolinguistics (Codó et al., 2012; Niño Murcia et al., 2020), that articulates the perspectives of ethnographic sociolinguistics and critical discourse analysis, we analyze the interactions developed in a 3rd year Language and Literature course, focusing especially on the teacher's interventions, with the aim of investigating to what extent her participation opens the space for the production and circulation of meanings that question the established order or, on the contrary, restricts it. In this way, we are interested in determining which pedagogical models underlie these educational practices by characterizing the pedagogical discourse that circulates in the classroom.
Downloads
References
Bajtin, M. (1982) [2005 edición original]. Estética de la creación verbal. Siglo XXI.
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. A Critical Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Bonnin, J., Otero, J. y Vilar, M. (2023), Estudiar la interacción: primeros pasos en la construcción y el análisis de los
datos. En M. Baretta y C. Tallatta (Eds.), Lenguaje en uso: De la teoría a la práctica. UNSAM EDITA.
Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Heineman.
Chafe, W. y Nichols, J. (1986). Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Chouliaraki, L. (1998). Regulation in ‘progressivist’ pedagogic discourse: Individualized teacher--pupil talk.
Discourse and Society, 9, 5-32.
Codó, E., Patiño Santos, A. y Unamuno, V. (2012). Hacer sociolingüística etnográfica en un mundo cambiante: retos
y aportaciones desde la perspectiva hispana. Spanish in Context, 9(2), 167-190.
De Fina, A. y Georgakopoulou, A. (2012). Analyzing narrative. Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives.
Cambridge University Press.
Dvoskin, G. (2020). Discurso relatado e posicionamentos ideológicos: a distribução social do saber e do poder no
discurso midiático. Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estudos do Discurso, 15(4), 193-213.
Dvoskin, G. (2023). La Educación Sexual Integral como movimiento pedagógico: tensiones entre el saber validado
y las experiencias directas. Logos: Revista De Lingüística, Filosofía Y Literatura, 33(1), 126-149.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge.
Freire, P. (2008) [1969 edición original]. Pedagogía del oprimido. Siglo XXI.
Giroux, H. A. (2015). Cuando las escuelas se convierten en zonas muertas para la imaginación. Revista de
Educación, 6(8).
Grinberg, S., Bocchio, M. C. y Villagran, C. (2016). Recepción y Puesta en Acto de la Reforma de la Escuela
Secundaria Obligatoria. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 24,1-26.
Heller, M. (2007). Distributed knowledge, distributed power: A sociolinguistics of structuration. Text & Talk - An
Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, 27(5-6), 633-653.
Lavandera, B. (1984). Variación y significado. Hachette.
Martín Rojo, L. (1997). El orden social de los discursos. Revista Discurso, 21-22, 1-37.
Martin, J. y White, P. (2005). The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
Niño Murcia, M., de los Heros, S. y Zavala, V. (2019). Hacia una sociolingüística crítica. IE.
Orlandi, E. (2011). A linguagem e seu funcionamento. As formas do discurso. Pontes editora.
Patiño Santos, A. (2011). La construcción discursiva del fracaso escolar: una etnografía sociolingüística crítica en un
centro educativo de Madrid. Spanish in Context, 8(2), 235-256.
Rampton, B. (2006). Language in late modernity: interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge University Press.
Rogers, R. (2011). An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education. Routledge.
Romero Massobrio, C., Tallatta, C. y Unamuno, V. (2023), Enfoques etnográficas: diseños de investigación y
métodos de recolección de datos. En M. Baretta y C. Tallatta (Eds.), Lenguaje en uso: De la teoría a la práctica.
UNSAM EDITA.
Steimberg, C. (2015). Desigualdades sociales, políticas territoriales y emergencia educativa. En J. C. Tedesco
(Comp.), La educación argentina hoy (pp. 191-234). Siglo XXI.
Tannen, D. (1996) [1984 edición original]. Género y discurso. Paidós.
Tosi, C. (2018). Escritos para enseñar: Los libros de texto en el aula. Paidós.
Tusón, A. y Unamuno, V. (1999). ¿De qué estamos hablando? El malentendido en el discurso escolar. Revista
Iberoamericana de discurso y sociedad, 1(1), 19-34.
Unamuno, V. (2016). Lenguaje y educación. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.
Zavala, V. (2019). Justicia sociolingüística para los tiempos de hoy. Ikala, Revista de lenguaje y cultura, 24(2), 118.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gabriel Dvoskin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Editorial Committee Educational Praxis Magazine:
I hereby declare that I am the author of the article titled (article name), that it is original and my own and that it was not previously published in any other format or medium. I declare to know that the magazine will not charge me any type of fee under any circumstances, nor will I receive any type of monetary compensation If it were accepted for publication in Educational Praxis, I authorize the aforementioned magazine to publish it digitally and to advertise it on its social networks.
If the work is published, I adhere to the Creative Commons license called "Attribution - Non-Commercial Share Alike CC BY-NC-SA", through which it is allowed to copy, reproduce, distribute, publicly communicate the work and generate derivative works, as long as when the original author is cited and acknowledged. This license has been used since September 2018. In 2016 CC BY NC ND 4.0 was adhered to; and in the years 2017 and 2018 (January-August) CC BY NC 4.0.
This CC BY-NC-SA Share Alike license does not, however, permit commercial use of the work. As an author, the journal may establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal, it allows me to self-archive the published articles, in their post-print version, in institutional, thematic repositories, personal web pages or any other relevant use. with the recognition of having been first published in this journal.
Educational Praxis adheres to DORA (Declaration on Research Assessment) signed in San Francisco, California, on December 16, 2012, and to the Declaration of Mexico (Joint Declaration LATINDEX - REDALYC - CLACSO - IBICT).
3.png)
_(2).png)
2.jpg)
