Justicia 4.0: ¿Y si la justicia fuese automatizada y controlada por algoritmos?

Edson de Almeida Coelho

Edson de Almeida Coelho Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina

Keywords:

justice, artificial intelligence, algorithm

Abstract

In a context of disruptive changes, it is said that we live in a kind of attention economy, a new and different business model, characterized by a concept where attention is valuable, because it means money, since it translates directly into an economy of time. Thus, companies, under the pretext of free use, “privacy” and “security”, often biased and illegal, capture personal data of users, either through social networks, videos, applications, games, thereby making a study-analysis of their profiles and using these to offer products and / or personalized services. Thus, the multiple applications derive in multiple distractions, which often become a prison without bars, because they make us unconscious/vulnerable, depriving us of the freedom to think autonomously, transforming us into consumer robots. This, without counting the direct violations of privacy through data manipulation. And all this for money in exchange for attention. Is this fair or not?

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aibar, E. (1996). La vida social de las máquinas: orígenes, desarrollo y perspectivas actuales en la sociología de la tecnología. REIS, 141-170.

Artificial Intelligence and the Legal Profession. (2018). In Horizon Scanning; Forward Thinking (03/05/2018 ed.). The Law Society of England and Wales: The Law Society of England and Wales.

Cabrera, R. F. (2018). Inteligencia artificial y su impacto en la justicia. Informática y Derecho: Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho Informático (segunda época)(5), 85-94.

Dabass, J., & Dabass, B. S. (2018). Scope of Artificial Intelligence in Law. Preprints. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201806.0474.v1

Engle, E. A. (2004). An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning: Using xTalk to Model the Alien Tort Claims Act and Torture Victim Protection Act. Rich. JL & Tech., 11, 53.

Fernández, L. E. Í. (2012). Breve historia de la Revolución Industrial. Nowtilus.

García, L. S. (2018). Las invenciones generadas por inteligencia artificial y sus implicaciones para el derecho de patentes. Informática y Derecho: Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho Informático (segunda época)(5), 49-84.

Garrell, A., & Guilera, L. (2019). La industria 4.0 en la sociedad digital. Marge books.

Granero, H. R. (2018). La inteligencia artificial aplicada al derecho-el cumplimiento del sueño de Hammurabi. Informática y Derecho: Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho Informático (segunda época)(5), 119-133.

Iracelay, J. J. V. (2018). Inteligencia artificial y derecho: principios y propuestas para una gobernanza eficaz. Informática y Derecho: Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho Informático (Segunda época)(5), 13-48.

Kingston, J. K. C. (2016, 2016). Artificial Intelligence and Legal Liability. Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXXIII, Cham.

Krausová, A. (2017). Intersections Between Law and Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Computer (IJC), 27(1), 55-68.

Lafferrière, J. N. (2017). ¿Los seres humanos somos meros "algoritmos"?: una reflexión crítica sobre el libro Homo Deus. Breve historia del mañana.

Marchant, G. E. (2017). Artificial intelligence and the future of legal practice. ABA SciTech Law, 14(1).

McJohn, S. M. (1998). Review of 'Artificial Legal Intelligence'. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 12, 241.

Pollo-Cattáneo, M. F. (2018). Resolviendo problemas en los sistemas de información. Buenos Aires, Editorial CEIT.

Schweisfurth, T., & Goduscheit, R. C. (2020). Por qué la creatividad es el campo de batalla definitivo entre la inteligencia artificial y la humana. BBC News Mundo.

Verheij, B. (2016). Formalizing value-guided argumentation for ethical systems design. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 24(4), 387-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-016-9189-y