The Construction of Plausible Futures in Dystopian Literature: A Theoretical Approach from Social and Cultural Semiotics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19137/anclajes-2023-2714Keywords:
Literature, Dystopia, Semiotics, Possible worlds, Literary genresAbstract
Dystopian fiction is a discursive genre made up of cultural products (literary texts, movies, series) aimed at producing a particular type of effects of sense in the model reader: ideally, in consuming them, readers will be capable of conducting a critical evaluation of their socio-political circumstances. Thus, dystopian fiction – which is a fictional discourse – aims at being the source of socio-political change through the intervention in the discursive sphere of the non-fictional. This article approaches the genre of dystopian fiction in literature from a semiotic perspective. Specifically, it focuses on studying the type of imagination and construction of possible worlds that define it. The thesis it presents is that dystopian fiction is characterised by a construction of futures that are plausible, that is, that have an anchorage in reality as it is and are therefore viable,
unlike what happens in science fiction.
Downloads
References
Appadurai, Arjun. The Future as Cultural Fact. Londres, Verso, 2013.
Atwood, Margaret. “The Handmaid’s Tale and Oryx and Crake ‘In Context’”. PMLA, vol. 119, n.° 3, 2004, pp. 513-17, https://doi.org/10.1632/003081204X20578
Atwood, Margaret. Writing with Intent: Essays, Reviews, Personal Prose 1983–2005. Nueva York, Carroll & Graf, 2005.
Atwood, Margaret. In Other Worlds. SF and the Human Imagination. Londres, Virago, 2011.
Babaee, Ruzbeth et al. “Critical Review on the Idea of Dystopia”. Review of European Studies, vol. 7, n.° 11, 2015, pp. 64-76, 10.5539/res.v7n11p64
Baccolini, Raffaela. “The Persistence of Hope in Dystopian Science Fiction”. PMLA, vol. 19, n.° 3, 2004, pp. 518-21, https://doi.org/10.1632/003081204X20587
Baccolini, Raffaela. “‘Hope isn’t stupid’: The Appropriation of Dystopia”. mediAzioni, vol. 27, 2020, D39-D49.
Bankov, Kristian. “From text to interaction”. Digital Age in Semiotics & Communication, vol. 1, n.° 1, 2018, pp. 7-15.
Booker, Michael K. The Dystopian Impulse in Modern Literature. Fiction as Social Criticism. Westport, Greenwood Press, 1994.
Byrne, Ruth M. J. The Rational Imagination. How People Create Alternatives to Reality. Cambridge, The MIT Press, 2005.
Demuru, Paolo. “Práticas de vida. Entre semiótica, comunicação e política”. Estudos semióticos, vol. 13, n.° 1, 2017, pp. 28-39.
Demuru, Paolo. “De Greimas a Eric Landowski. A experiência do sentido, o sentido da experiência: semiótica, interação e processos sócio-comunicacionais”. Galáxia, Especial 2, 2019, pp. 85-113, https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-25532019545630
Dolezel, Lubomir. Heterocosmica. Fiction and Possible Words. Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press, 1998.
Doyle, Jessica. “The 60 Best Dystopian Books”. ABEBooks.com, 2018, https://www.abebooks.com/books/best-dystopia-books/
Eco, Umberto. “Possible Worlds and Text Pragmatics: ‘Un drame bien parisien’”. Versus, vol. 19/20, 1978, pp. 4-72.
Eco, Umberto. Tratado de semiótica general. Barcelona, Lumen, 2000.
Fabbri, Paolo. El giro semiótico. Barcelona, Gedisa, 1998.
Fitting, Peter. “Unmasking the Real? Critique and Utopia in Recent SF Films”. Dark Horizons. Science Fiction and the Dystopian Imagination, editado por T. Moylan y R. Baccolini, Londres/Nueva York, Routledge, 2003.
Floch, Jean-Marie. Sémiotique, marketing et communication. París, Presses Universitaires de France, 1990.
Fontanille, Jacques. Pratiques sémiotiques. París, Presses Universitaires de France, 2008.
Fontanille, Jacques. Formes de vie. Lieja, Presses Universitaires de Liège, 2015.
Goñi, U. “Argentina holds historic abortion vote as 1m women rally to demand change”. The Guardian, 8 ago. 2018, https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2018/aug/07/argentina-abortion-vote-legalisation-senate-mass-rally.
Goodman, Nelson. Ways of Worldmaking. Londres, Hackett, 1978.
Hénault, Anne. Les enjeux de la sémiotique. París, Presses Universitaires de France, 2012.
Howells, Coral A. “Margaret Atwood’s dystopian visions: The Handmaid’s Tale and Oryx and Crake”. The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood, editado por C. A. Howells, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Kehe, Jason. “‘Sci-Fi,’ Dystopia, and Hope in the Age of Trump: a Fiction Roundtable”. Wired, 4 jul. 2017, https://www.wired.com/story/dystopia-trump-science-fiction-roundtable/?mbid=email_onsiteshare
Koselleck, Reinhardt. Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1979.
Kuznicki, Slawomir. Margaret Atwood’s Dystopian Fiction. Fire Is Being Eaten. Cambridge, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017.
Landowski, Eric. Les interactions risquées. París, Presses Universitaires de France, 1997.
Landowski, Eric. “¿Habría que rehacer la semiótica?”. Contratexto, n.° 20, 2012, pp. 127-155, https://doi.org/10.26439/contratexto2012.n020.176
Landowski, Eric. “Sociossemiótica: uma teoria geral do sentido”. Galáxia, n.° 27, 2014, pp. 10-20, https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-25542014119609
Levitas, Ruth. Utopia as Method. The Imaginary Reconstitution of Society. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Lorusso, Anna Maria. Semiotica della cultura. Bari/Roma, Laterza, 2010.
Lyotard, Jean-François. La posmodernidad (explicada a los niños). Barcelona, Gedisa, 1987.
Mahdawi, Arwa. “Trump-supporting protesters are wearing handmaid’s outfits – do they not see the irony?”. The Guardian, 25 abr. 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/25/trump-handmaids-tale-coronavirus
Moreno Barreneche, Sebastián. “¿Es la mediatización una patología social?”. Revista Chilena de Semiótica, n.° 13, 2020, pp. 152-63.
Moreno Barreneche, Sebastián. “La mediatización de la política como amenaza al sistema democrático: una aproximación crítica basada en el estado actual de la investigación”. Argumentos, n.° 25, 2022, pp. 65-95.
Moreno Barreneche, Sebastián. “The Imaginary Construction of the Political Future”. Versus, vol. 1, n.° 134, 2022, pp. 143-64, https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.14649/104505
Moylan, Tom y Raffaela Baccolini, editores. Dark Horizons. Science Fiction and the Dystopian Imagination. Londres/Nueva York, Routledge, 2003.
Nussbaum, Martha. Justicia poética. Barcelona, Andrés Bello, 1995.
Paolucci, Claudio. “Sens et cognition: La narrativité entre sémiotique et sciences cognitives”. Signata, vol. 3, 2012, pp. 299-316, https://doi.org/10.4000/signata.948
Parrinder, Patrick, editor. Learning from Other Worlds. Estrangement, Cognition and the Politics of Science Fiction and Utopia. Liverpool, Liverpool University Press, 2000.
Pereira, Gustavo. El asedio a la imaginación. Granada, Colmares, 2018.
Perusset, Alain. Sémiotique des formes de vie. Lovaina la Nueva, De Boeck, 2020.
Seyferth, Peter. “A Glimpse of Hope at the End of the Dystopian Century: The Utopian Dimension of Critical Dystopias”. ILCEA, vol. 30, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4000/ilcea.4454
Shklovski, Viktor. “El arte como artificio”. Teoría de la literatura de los formalistas rusos, compilado por T. Todorov, Buenos Aires, Siglo XXI, 1965.
Suvin, Darko. “Theses on Dystopia 2001”. Dark Horizons. Science Fiction and the Dystopian Imagination, editado por T. Moylan y R. Baccolini, Londres/Nueva York, Routledge, 2003.
Suvin, Darko. Defined by a Hollow. Essays on Utopia, Science Fiction and Political Epistemology. Oxford, Peter Lang, 2010.
Vargas Llosa, Mario. La civilización del espectáculo. Madrid, Alfaguara, 2012.
Varsam, Maria. “Concrete Dystopia: Slavery and Its Others”. Dark Horizons. Science Fiction and the Dystopian Imagination, editado por T. Moylan y R. Baccolini, Londres/Nueva York, Routledge, 2003.
Verón, Eliseo. La semiosis social. Barcelona, Gedisa, 1988.
Verón, Eliseo. “Semiótica y teoría de la democracia”. Revista de Occidente, vol. 92, 1989, pp. 130-42.
Volli, Ugo. “Mondi possibili, logica, semiotica”.Versus, vol. 19/20, 1978, pp. 123-48.
Walsh, C. From Utopia to Nightmare. Nueva York, Harper Collins, 1962.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors must adhere to the Creative Commons license called "Attribution - Non-Commercial - Share Alike CC BY-NC-SA", through which it is allowed to copy, reproduce, distribute, publicly communicate the work and generate derivative works, provided and when the original author is cited and acknowledged. However, it is not allowed to use the work or its possible derivative works for commercial purposes. The authors may establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with the acknowledgment of having been first published in this journal.
The publication of contents in this journal does not imply any royalty or charge for the contributors.