A navalha de Ockham desafiada, ou quando menos não é mais: pluralismo médico na sociedade global
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19137/qs.v24i3.4837Palavras-chave:
medicina tradicional, medicina convencional, integração, organização do conhecimentoResumo
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate. Em uma curiosa instancia de metábasis, esta célebre frase –“a pluralidade não deve nunca ser posta sem necessidade”- parece encontrar uma expressão ideal contemporaneamente na área da saúde: o sistema medico derivado da ciência moderna ocidental disseminou-se amplamente até ser globalmente conhecida como “medicina convencional”. Esta parece ser também a percepção de diversos investigadores –historiadores, especialistas em medicina social, entre outros- que enfatizaram a difusão global da medicina ocidental, citando, como rodapé, a “chegada” de outros sistemas médicos considerados “alternativos” e “complementários”. Porém, a integração de diversas tradições culturais é um fenômeno que vem ganhando espaço e visibilidade. Um exemplo notável são os esforços para estabelecer diálogo entre diversas culturas medicas, já não em relação com a subordinação senão como equivalentes em suas contribuições ao objetivo geral de promoção, preservação e recuperação da saúde física, mental e social. O foco deste trabalho é a construção de uma estrutura conceitual e metodológica unificada como parte da iniciativa da Organização Mundial da Saúde para criar um sistema de classificação que facilite a compreensão de tendências globais e locais. Como estudo de caso, analisa-se a recente (maio de 2019) inclusão da nomeada Medicina Tradicional na 11° edição de Classificação Internacional de Enfermidades (CIE-11), a qual entrará em vigência em 1° de janeiro de 2022.Downloads
Referências
Alfonso-Goldfarb, A.M., Waisse, S. & Ferraz, M. H. (2013). From shelves to cyberspace. Organization of knowledge and the complex identity of history of science. Isis, 104 (3), 551–560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/673274
Baer, H. A. (2004). Medical pluralism. In Ember, C. & Ember, M. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of medical anthropology. Health and illness in the world’s cultures. Vol. 1, Topics (pp. 109–116). New York, USA: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Bivins, Roberta. (2007). Alternative medicine? A history. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bornhöft, G. & Matthiessen, P. F. (Ed.). (2011). Homeopathy in healthcare. Effectiveness, appropriateness, safety, costs. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Cant, S. & Sharma, U. (1999).A new medical pluralism? Alternative medicine, doctors, patients and the state. London, England: Routledge.
Choi, S.-H., Watanabe, K., Shim, B., Zhu, H. & Roberts, R. (2006). International Classification of Traditional Medicine: ICTM. Proposal to WHO-FIC Family Development Committee for inclusion of ICTM in the World Organization Family of International Classifications. Meeting of the Collaborating Centres for the Family of International Classifications. Document C408. Available at: https://www.who.int/classifications/network/meetings/en/.
Cueto, M, Brown T.M. & Fee, E. (2019). The World Health Organization. A history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cueto, M. (2004). The ORIGINS of primary health care and SELECTIVE primary health care. American Journal of Public Health, 93 (11), 1864-1874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.94.11.1864
Dinges, M. (2013). Medical pluralism—past and present. Towards a more precise concept. In Jütte, R. (Ed.). Medical pluralism. Past—present—future (pp. 195–205). Stuttgart, Germany: Franz Steiner.
Dinges, M. (2014). Introduction. In Dinges, M. (Ed.). Medical pluralism and homoeopathy in India and Germany (1810–2010). A comparison of practices (pp. 7–30). Stuttgart, Germany: Franz Steiner.
Djulbegovic, B. & Guyatt, G. H. (2017). Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on. The Lancet, 390, 415–423.
Ernst, W. (2013). Medical plurality, medical pluralism and plural medicine. A critical reappraisal of recent scholarship. In Jütte, R. (Ed.). Medical pluralism. Past—present—future (pp. 11–23). Stuttgart, Germany: Franz Steiner.
Fontanarosa, P. B. & Lundberg, G. D. (1998). Alternative medicine meets science. JAMA, 280 (18), 1618–1619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.18.1618
Foran, B. J. (2007). Medical pluralism and global health policy. The integration of traditional medicine in health care systems. PhD dissertation. PhD in Social Policy. University of Western Sidney, Australia. Available at: https://researchdirect.westernsydney.edu.au/islandora/object/uws:3623
Gross, M. (2018). Between party, people and profession. The many faces of the ‘doctor’ during the Cultural Revolution. Medical History, 62 (3), 333-356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2018.23
Hsu, Elisabeth. (2008). Medical pluralism. In Heggenhougen, K. & Quah, S.R. (Ed.). International encyclopedia of public health (pp. 316–319). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
Institute of Medicine (United States). Committee on the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine by the American Public. (2005). Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the United States. Washington D. C.: National Academies Press. Available at: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK83799
Jinfgu, T. (1985). Traditional Chinese Medicine. Past, present and future. In Akerelle, O., Stott, G. & Weibo, L. (Ed.). The role of traditional medicine in primary health care in China (pp. 11–18). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO/Ministry of Public Health of the People’s Republic of China. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/60624
Jütte, R. (Ed.). (2013). Medical pluralism. Past—present—future. Stuttgart, Germany: Franz Steiner.
Jütte, R. (2017). Medical pluralism: what can we learn from history?, Inaugural lecture at the Homeopathic World Congress, Leipzig. Available at: http://www.igm-bosch.de/content/language1/downloads/MedicalPluralism.pdf.
Kaptchuk, T. J. & Eisenberg, D. M. (2001) Varieties of healing 1. Medical pluralism in the United States. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2001, 135(3), 189–195.
Klayman, D. L. (1985). Qinghaosu (artemisinin). An antimalarial drug from China. Science, 228, 1045–1055.
Leslie, C. (1980). Medical pluralism in world perspective [1]. Social Science & Medicine, 14B, 1919–195.
Madden, R., Sykes, C. & Ustun, T. B. (2007). World Health Organization Family of International Classifications. Definition, scope and purpose. Available at: https://www.who.int/classifications/en/FamilyDocument2007.pdf
Métailié, G. (Ed.). (2015). Science and civilization in China, Vol. VI, Part 4. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Métailié, G. (2019). How traditional Chinese materia medica entered modern medicine, 1956–1977. In Alfonso-Goldfarb, A. M., Ferraz, M. H., Goldfarb, J. L. & Waisse, S. (Ed.). História da ciência na PUC-SP. Uma viagem de 20 anos (pp. 76-82). São Paulo, Brazil: Editora da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo.
Miller, L.H. & Su, X. (2011). Artemisinin: a discovery from the Chinese herbal garden. Cell, 146 (6), 855–858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.024
Morris, W, Gomes, S. & Allen, M. (2012). International Classification of Traditional Medicine. Global Advances in Health and Medicine 1 (4), 38-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2012.1.4.005
Penkala-Gawęcka, D. & Rajtar, M. (2016). Introduction to the Special Issue ‘Medical Pluralism and Beyond.’ Anthropology & Medicine, 23 (2), 129–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2016.1180584
Shi, C.-C., Su, Y.-C., Liao, C.-C. & Lin, J.-C. (2010). Patterns of medical pluralism among adults. Results from the 2001 National Health Interview Survey in Taiwan. BMC Health Services Research, 10, article number: 191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-191
Sivin, N. (Ed.). (2001). Science and civilisation in China, Vol. VI, Part 6. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Souza, E. P. (2010). Ciências de interface: problemas, desafios e estudo de caso. PhD dissertation. PhD in History of Science. Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo, Brazil. Available at: https://tede2.pucsp.br/bitstream/handle/13239/1/Elaine%20Pereira%20de%20Souza.pdf
Tong, X. (1985). Combining Traditional Chinese Medicine and modern medicine. In Akerelle, O., Stott, G. & Weibo, L. (Ed.). The role of traditional medicine in primary health care in China (pp. 11–18). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO/Ministry of Public Health of the People’s Republic of China. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/60624
Tu, Y. (2011). The discovery of artemisinin (qinghaosu) and gifts from Chinese medicine. Nature Medicine, 17 (10), 1217–1220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2471
World Health Assembly (WHA) 20. (1967). WHO Nomenclature Regulations 1967. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/89478
World Health Organization (WHO). (1977). The promotion and development of traditional medicine. Meeting report. Geneva: WHO. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/40995
World Health Organization (WHO). (1990). A standard international acupuncture nomenclature: memorandum from a WHO meeting. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 68 (2): 165–169. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/50680
World Health Organization (WHO). (2002). WHO Traditional medicine strategy 2002–2005. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/67163/WHO_EDM_TRM_2002.1.pdf?sequence=1
World Health Organization (WHO). (2013). WHO Traditional medicine strategy 2014–2023. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. Available at: who.int/medicines/publications/traditional/trm_strategy14_23/en/
World Health Organization (WHO). (2019). WHO global report on traditional and complementary medicine 2019. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. Available at: https://www.who.int/traditional-complementary-integrative-medicine/WhoGlobalReportOnTraditionalAndComplementaryMedicine2019.pdf?ua=1
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Al momento de enviar sus contribuciones, los colaboradores deberán declarar que poseen el permiso del archivo o repositorio donde se obtuvieron los documentos que se anexan al trabajo, cualquiera sea su formato (manuscritos inéditos, imágenes, archivos audiovisuales, etc.), permiso que los autoriza a publicarlos y reproducirlos, liberando a la revista y sus editores de toda responsabilidad o reclamo de terceros.
Asimismo, los autores deben adherir a la licencia Creative Commons denominada “Atribución - No Comercial CC BY-NC-SA”, mediante la cual el autor permite copiar, reproducir, distribuir, comunicar públicamente la obra y generar obras derivadas, siempre y cuando se cite y reconozca al autor original. No se permite, sin embargo, utilizar la obra con fines comerciales. Los autores podrán establecer acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con el reconocimiento de haber sido publicado primero en esta revista.
La publicación de contenidos en esta revista no implica regalía ni cargo alguno para los/as contribuyentes.
Quinto Sol adhiere adhiere a DORA (Declaration on Research Assessment) firmada en San Francisco, California, el 16 de diciembre de 2012, y a la Declaración de México (Declaración Conjunta LATINDEX - REDALYC - CLACSO - IBICT).
4.png){kind=logo}
2.png)
_(2).png)
2.jpg)
1.jpg)
