Specific leaf area response of Panicum coloratum L. with different defoliation management

  • Carlos Ferri Facultad de Agronomía, UNLPam
  • Varinia Jouve

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19137/semiarida.2021(02).63-­70

Keywords:

C4 grass, defoliation interval, defoliation height, phenotypic plasticity, tolerance to grazing

Abstract

The objective was to evaluate the response of the specific leaf area (AFE) to different combinations of cutting interval (IC) and cutting height (AC) on tillers cohorts (Co) of Panicum coloratum L. The work was carried out from September­March, in greenhouse, on 81 plants grown in PVC pots and distributed in a DCA with factorial arrangement of treatments and repeated measures. The treatments included nine replications of the possible combinations between the IC of 2, 4 and 6 leaves.tiller­1 and the AC of 40, 80 and 120 mm for seven cohorts of tillers. In each cut, three tillers were randomly selected per cohort and repetition in which the leaf area (AF) of the penultimate expanded leaf was determined; the leaf blade were dried and weighed to determine their weight (PF)

and calculate the AFE. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and the slope and intercept of the relationship between (log10) PF and (log10) AF were estimated, with dummy variables to establish differences between the IC. The variation in AFE as a function of IC was different according to AC (IC×AC interaction; p<0.001) and Co (IC×Co interaction; p<0.004). The slope of the relationship was 1.06, 1.11 and 1.18 (R2=0.97; p<0.001) for the IC of 6, 4 and 2 leaves.tiller­1, respectively, higher (p< 0.01) to 1.0 and different (p<0.01) from each other. This indicates that the PF increased faster than the AF as the size of the leaf blade increased. Furthermore, for each unit of increase in AF, the increase in PS was greater with frequent cuts (<IC). However, the ordinate to the origin of ­1.46, ­1.73 and ­2.03 for the IC of 6, 4 and 2 leaves.tiller­1 indicates that the decrease in the IC increases the AFE. It is concluded that P. coloratum L. presents phenotypic plasticity to defoliation. This will allow, at least in part, to offset the effect of the decrease in growth due to the removal of the leaf area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Caldwell, M.M., Richards, J.H., Johnson, D.A., Nowak, R.S. & Dzurec, R.S. (1981). Coping with herbivory: photosynthetic capacity and resource allocation in two semiarid Agropyron bunchgrasses. Oecologia, 50, 14-24.

Chapman, D., Tharmaraj, J., Agnusdei, M. & Hill, J. (2011). Regrowth dynamics and grazing decision rules: further analysis for dairy production systems bases on perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) pastures. Grass and Forage Science, 67, 77-95.

Craine, J.M. & Towne, E.G. (2010). High leaf tissue density grassland species consistently more abundant across topographic and disturbance contrasts in a North American tallgrass prairie. Plant and Soil, 337, 193-203.

Di Rienzo, J.A., Casanoves, F., Balzarini, M.G., González, L., Tablada, M. & Robledo, C.W. (2019) InfoStat versión 2019. Centro de Transferencia InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. URL http://www.infostat.com.ar

Duru, M. & Ducrocq, H. (2000). Growth and senescence of the successive grass leaves on a tiller. Ontogenic development and effect of temperature. Annals of Botany, 85, 635-643.

Ferri, C., Brizuela, M., Cid, M. & Stritzler, N. (2006). Dinámica de acumulación de láminas foliares y estructura del forraje diferido de Panicum coloratum L. Agricultura Técnica, 66, 376-384.

Fulkerson, W. & Slack, K. (1994). Leaf number as a criterion for determining defoliation time for Lolium perenne. 1. Effect of water-soluble carbohydrates and senescence. Grass and Forage Science, 49, 373-377.

Grant, S., Barthram, G. & Torvell, L. (1981). Components of regrowth in grazed and cut Lolium perenne swards. Grass and Forage Science, 36, 155-168.

Groot, J.C.J. & Neuteboom, J.H. (1997). Composition and digestibility during ageing of Italian ryegrass leaves of consecutive insertion levels. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 75, 227-236.

Gustavsson, A.M. (2011). A developmental scale for perennial forage grasses based on the decimal code framework. Grass and Forage Science, 66, 93-108.

Johnson, I.R. & Thornley, J.H.M. (1983). Vegetative crop growth model incorporating leaf area expansion and senescence, and applied to grass production. Plant, Cell & Environment, 6, 721-729.

Kitajima, K. & Poorter, L. (2010). Tissue-level leaf toughness, but not lamina thickness, predicts sapling leaf lifespan and shade tolerance of tropical tree species. New Phytologist, 186, 708-721.

Kitajima, K., Mulkey, S.S. & Wright, S.J. (1997) Seasonal leaf phenotypes in the canopy of a tropical dry forest: photosynthetic characteristics and associated traits. Oecologia, 109, 490-498.

Lattanzi, F.A., Schnyder, H. & Thornton, B. (2004). Defoliation effects on carbon and nitrogen substrate import and tissue-bound efflux in leaf growth zones of grasses. Plant, Cell and Environment, 27, 347-356.

Lemaire, G. & Chapman, D. (1996). Tissue flows in grazed plant communities. En: J. Hodgson & A.W. Illius A.W. (eds.). The ecology and management of grazing systems (pp. 3-36). Wallingford: CAB International.

Mitchell, R., Fritz, J., Moore, K., Moser, L., Vogel, K., Redfearn, D. & Wester, D. (2001). Predicting forage quality in switchgrass and big bluestem. Agronomy Journal, 93, 118-124.

Montagner, D.B., Nascimento, J.D., Sousa, B.M.L., Vilela, H.E., Euclides, V.P.B., da Silva, S.C., Sbrissia, A.F. & Marciele Neves Carloto, M.N. (2011). Morphogenetic and structural characteristics of tillers of guinea grass of different age and grazing severities. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 40, 2105-2110.

Paiva, A.J., da Silva, S.C., Pereira, L.E.T., Caminha, F.O., Pereira, P.M. & Guarda, V.D.A. (2011) Morphogenesis on age categories of tillers in marandu palisadegrass. Scientia Agricola, 68, 626-631.

Peri, P.L., Moot, D.J., McNeil, D.L. & Lucas, R.J. (2003). Modelling net photosynthetic rate of field-grown cocksfoot leaves to account for regrowth duration. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 46, 105-115.

Poorter, H., Niinemets, U., Poorter, L., Wright, I. & Villar R. (2009) Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. New Phytologist, 182, 565-588

Robson M.J. & Deacon, M.J. (1978). Nitrogen deficiency in small closed communities of S24 ryegrass. II. Changes in the weight and chemical composition of single leaves during their growth and death. Annals of Botany, 42, 1199-1213.

Sanderson, M.A. & Moore, K.J. (1999). Switchgrass morphological development predicted from day of the year or degree day models. Agronomy Journal, 91, 732-734.

Schnyder, H., Schäufele, R., Visser, R. & Nelson, C.J. (2000). An integrated view of C and N uses in leaf growth zones of defoliated grasses. En: G. Lemaire, J. Hodgson, A. Moraes, P.C.F. Carvalho & C. Nabinger (eds.). Grassland ecophysiology and grazing ecology (pp. 41-60). Wallingford: CAB International.

Shipley, B. & Vu, T-T. (2002). Dry matter content as a measure of dry matter concentration in plants and their parts. New Phytologist, 153, 359-364. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0028-646X.2001.00320.x

Temu, V.W., Rude, B.J. & Baldwin, B.S. (2014). Nutritive value response of native warm-season forage grasses to harvest intervals and durations in mixed stands. Plants, 3, 266-283. DOI: 10.3390/plants3020266.

Unruh, J.B., Gaussoin, R.E. & Wiest S.C. (1996). Basal growth temperatures and growth rate constants of warm-season turfgrass species. Crop Science, 36, 997-999.

Van Loo, E.N. (1993). On the relation between tillering, leaf area dynamics and growth of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). PhD thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands

Wallace, L.L. (1981). Growth morphology and gas exchange of mycorrhizal Panicum coloratum, a C4 grass species, under different clipping and fertilization regimes. Oecologia, 49, 272-278.

Published

2021-07-12

How to Cite

Ferri, C., & Jouve, V. (2021). Specific leaf area response of Panicum coloratum L. with different defoliation management. Semiárida, 31(2), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.19137/semiarida.2021(02).63-­70

Issue

Section

Artículos Científicos y Técnicos