Human perceptions and attitudes in the production of alfalfa under irrigation in La Pampa, Argentina

  • Ana P. Álamo Iriarte 1 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Argentina 2 Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), EEA “Ing. Agr. Guillermo Covas”. Anguil, La Pampa, Argentina.
  • Fabricio D. Cid 1 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Argentina3 Instituto Multidisciplinario de Investigaciones Biológicas de San Luis (IMIBIO­SL), Centro Científico Tecnológico San Luis, CONICET. San Luis, Argentina 4 Universidad Nacional de San Luis, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Química, Bioquímica y Farmacia. San Luis, Argentina.
  • Ramón A. Sosa 5 Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. La Pampa, Argentina.
  • Jaime N Bernardos 2 Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), EEA “Ing. Agr. Guillermo Covas”. Anguil, La Pampa, Argentina.5 Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. La Pampa, Argentina.

Keywords:

agriculture, biological control, Ctenomys, damage, social component

Abstract

A case of wild species management. In La Pampa province, tuco­tucos (Ctenomys azarae) cause economic losses in alfalfa productive systems under pressurized irrigation. As a management strategy, biological control with birds of prey is promoted. Since this problem is based on human­wildlife interaction, the study of social aspects is paramount. The aim of this paper was to study the attitudes and perceptions of the social component in order to define level of damage and selected method efficiency to control tuco­tucos. Workers were surveyed to define the productive problem and determine their level of knowledge about tuco­tucos and birds of prey. Moreover, the attitudes of rural workers during the study and the execution of the biological control project were documented. The damage caused by tuco­tucos represents between 0.6 and 7 % of the annual earnings by the selling of alfalfa big bales. The damage is mainly quantified in the cost and number of harvesting machinery blades that have to be replaced and the reduction of the big bales quality. Workers see biological control as an opportunity to face the problem and recognize their ecological role. Social participation in the project improves the understanding of the biological intervening situation and favors the application of management practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Álamo Iriarte, A. P., Sartor, P. D., & Bernardos, J. N. (2019). Agriculture in semiarid ecosystems favors the increase fossorial rodent’s activity in La Pampa, Argentina. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 65(3), 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344­019­1281­7

Aumassanne, C., y Fontanella, D. (2018). Evolución del área regada mediante pivote central en el Sistema de aprovechamiento Múltiple de 25 de Mayo La Pampa. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria.

Baldo, M. B., Luna, F., & Antenucci, C. D. (2016). Does acclimation to contrasting atmospheric humidities affect evaporative water loss in the South American subterranean rodent Ctenomys talarum? Journal of Mammalogy, 97(5), 1312­-1320. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyw104

Baldwin, R. A. (2015). Developing an IPM program for controlling pocket gophers and voles in alfalfa. Proceedings, 2015 Western Alfalfa and Forage Conference. Las Vegas, pp. 99­-107. http://alfalfa.ucdavis.edu/+symposium/proceedings/2015/Baldwin.pdf

Baldwin, R. A., Salmon, T. P., Schmidt, R. H., & Timm, R. M. (2014). Perceived damage and areas of needed research for wildlife pests of California agriculture. Integrative zoology, 9(3), 265-­279.

Bidau, C. (2015). Ctenomys azarae, Thomas 1903. En J. Patton, U. Pardiñas, & G. D’Elia (Eds.), Mammals of South America (Vol. 2, pp. 823­824). The University of Chicago Press.

Brown, P. R., Tuan, N. P., Singleton, G. R., Ha, P. T. T., Hoa, P. T., Hue, D. T., Tan, T. Q., Tuat, N. V., Jacob, J., & Müller, W. J. (2006). Ecologically based management of rodents in the real world: Applied to a mixed agroecosystem in Vietnam. Ecological Applications, 16(5), 2000­-2010.

Bruggers, R. L., & Zaccagnini, M. E. (1994). Vertebrate pest problems related to agricultural production and applied research in Argentina. Vida Silvestre Neotropical, 3(2), 71-­83.

Canavelli, S. B., Swisher, M. E., & Branch, L. C. (2013). Factors related to farmers’ preferences to decrease monk parakeet damage to crops. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 18(2), 124­-137.

Cano, E., Fernández, B., & Montés, M. (1980). Inventario integrado de los recursos naturales de la provincia de La Pampa: Clima, geomorfología, suelo y vegetación (INTA, Gobierno de la Provincia de La Pampa, & UNLPam, Eds.).

Caruso, N., Luengos Vidal, E., Lucherini, M., Guerisoli, M., Martinez, S., & Casanave, E. (2017). Carnívoros en el sudoeste de la provincia de Buenos Aires: Ecología y conflictos con los ganaderos. Revista de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, 43(2), 165­-174.

Castaño­Uribe, C., Hoogesteijn, A., López, C. A., Núñez, R., Rosas­Rosas, O., Febles, J. L., Moreno, R., Valdés, S., Artavia, A., Young, N., & others. (2016). II. Conflictos entre felinos y humanos en América Latina. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH),. http://repositoriodigital.com/handle/20.500.11761/32575

Contreras, J. R., y Maceiras, A. J. (1970). Relaciones entre tucu­tucos y los procesos del suelo en la región semiárida del sudoeste bonaerense. Agro, 17(17), 1­17.

Dentzien­Dias, P. C., & Figueiredo, A. E. Q. (2015). Burrow architecture and burrowing dynamics of Ctenomys in foredunes and paleoenvironmental implications. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 439, 166­-175.

Don Carlos, A. W., Bright, A. D., Teel, T. L., & Vaske, J. J. (2009). Human–black bear conflict in urban areas: An integrated approach to management response. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 14(3), 174­-184.

García Brea, A., Zapata, S. C., Procopio, D. E., Martínez Peck, R., & Travaini, A. (2010). Evaluación del interés de productores ganaderos en el control selectivo y eficiente de predadores en la Patagonia Austral. Acta Zoológica Mexicana, 26(2), 303­-321.

Gebhardt, K., Anderson, A. M., Kirkpatrick, K. N., & Shwiff, S. A. (2011). A review and synthesis of bird and rodent damage estimates to select California crops. Crop Protection, 30(9), 1109­-1116.

Guber, R. (2004). El salvaje metropolitano: Reconstrucción del conocimiento social en el trabajo de campo (2da Edición). Paidós.

Jackson, J. (1989). Los tuco tuco. Presencia INTA, 3(18), 6­9.

Jacobs, M. H., Vaske, J. J., Teel, T. L., & Manfredo, M. J. (2012). Human dimensions of wildlife. En L. Steg, A. E. Van den Berg, & J. de Groot (Eds.), Environmental psychology: An introduction. British Psychological Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Kawulich, B. B. (2005). La observación participante como método de recolección de datos. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), 43.

Kross, S. M., & Baldwin, R. A. (2016). Gopherbusters? A review of the candidacy of Barn Owls as the ultimate natural pest control option. 27, 345-­352.

Labuschagne, L., Swanepoel, L. H., Taylor, P. J., Belmain, S. R., & Keith, M. (2016). Review. Are avian predators effective biological control agents for rodents pest management in agricultural systems?. Biological Control, 101, 94­-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.07.003

Lee Lamb, B., & Cline, K. (2003). Public knowledge and perceptions of black­tailed prairie dogs. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 8(2), 127-­143.

Luna, F., & Antinuchi, C. D. (2006). Cost of foraging in the subterranean rodent Ctenomys talarum: Effect of soil gardness. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 84(5), 661­-667.

Luna, F., Antinuchi, C. D., & Busch, C. (2000). Ritmos de actividad locomotora y uso de las cuevas en condiciones seminaturales en Ctenomys talarum (Rodentia, Octodontidae). Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 73(1), 39-­46.

Manfredo, M. J., & Dayer, A. A. (2004). Concepts for exploring the social aspects of human­wildlife conflict in a global context. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 9(4), 1­20.

Manzano García, J., Jiménez Escobar, N. D., Lobo Allende, R., & Cailly Arnulphi, V. B. (2017). El cóndor andino (Vultur gryphus):¿predador o carroñero? Pluralidad de percepciones entre los saberes locales y el discurso académico en las sierras centrales de Argentina.

Martínez­Sastre, R., García, D., Minarro, M., & MartínLópez, B. (2020). Farmers’ perceptions and knowledge of natural enemies as providers of biological control in cider apple orchards. Journal of Environmental Management, 266, 110-589.

Meyrom, K., Motro, Y., Leshem, Y., Aviel, S., Izhaki, I., Argyle, F., & Charter, M. (2009). Nest­box use by the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in a biological pest control program in the Beit She’an valley, Israel. Ardea, 97(4), 463­-467.

Moore, T., Van Vuren, D., & Ingels, C. (1998). Are barn owls a biological control for gophers? Evaluatingeffectiveness in vineyards and orchards. Proceedings of the 18th Vertebrate Pest Conference.

Morello, J., Matteucci, S. D., Rodriguez, A. F., & Silva, M. E. (2012). Ecorregiones y complejos Ecosistémicos de Argentina. Orientación Gráfica Editora, Buenos Aires.

Muñoz­Pedreros, A. (2004). Aves rapaces y control biológico de plagas. En A. Muñoz­Pedreros, J. R. Rau, & J. Yañez (Eds.), Aves Rapaces de Chile (p. 386). CEA Ediciones.

Muñoz­Pedreros, Andrés, Gil, C., Yáñez, J., & Rau, J. R. (2010). Raptor habitat management and its implication on the biological control of the Hantavirus. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 56(5), 703-­715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344­010­0364­2

Muñoz­Pedreros, Andrés, Guerrero, M., & Möller, P. (2018). Knowledge and perceptions of birds of prey among local inhabitants in Chile: Implications for the biological control of rodent pests. Gayana, 82(2), 128­-138.

Naughton­Treves, L., & Treves, A. (2005). Socioecological factors shaping local support for wildlife: Crop­raiding by elephants and other wildlife in Africa. Conservation Biology series.Cambridge, 9, 252.

Ojasti, J. (2000). Manejo de Fauna Silvestre Neotropical. En F. Dallmeie & J. Ojasti (Eds.). Smithsonian Institution/MAB Biodiversity Program.

Peleg, O., Nir, S., Leshem, Y., Meyrom, K., Aviel, S., Charter, M., Roulin, A., & Izhak, I. (2018). Three decades of satisfied israeli farmers: Barn Owls (Tyto alba) as biological pest control of rodents. Proceedings 28th of the Vertebrate Pest Conference, 28(28), 208­-217. https://doi.org/10.5070/V42811039

Peterson, M. N., Birckhead, J. L., Leong, K., Peterson, M. J., & Peterson, T. R. (2010). Rearticulating the myth of human­wildlife conflict. Conservation Letters, 3(2), 74­-82.

Puig, S., Rosi, M. I., Videla, F., & Roig, V. G. (1992). Estudio ecológico del roedor subterráneo Ctenomys mendocinus en la precordillera de Mendoza, Argentina: Densidad poblacional y uso del espacio. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 65, 247­-254.

Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review.Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417-­2431.

Sanchez Serrano, R. (2004). La observación participante como escenario y configuración de la diversidad de significados. En M. L. Tarrés (Ed.), Observar, escuchar y comprender sobre la tradición cualitativa en la investigación social (FLACSO, El Colegio de México, Miguel Ángel Porrúa, pp. 97­-131).

Singleton, G. R. (1999). Ecologically­ based management of rodents [ACIAR Monograph N° 59]. http://aciar.gov.au/publication/mn059

Singleton, G. R. (2003). Impacts of rodents on rice production in Asia. IRRI discussion paper series. St John, F. A., Edwards­Jones, G., & Jones, J. P. (2011).

Conservation and human behaviour: Lessons from social psychology. Wildlife Research, 37(8), 658­-667.

Tobin, M. E., & Fall, M. W. (2004). Pest control: Rodents. Wildlife Damage Management. Internet Center for USDA National Wildlife Research Center­Staff Publications. University of Nebraska­Lincoln Year.

Wendt, C. A., & Johnson, M. D. (2017). Multi­scale analysis of barn owl nest box selection on Napa Valley vineyards. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 247, 75­-83.

Whisson, D. A., Orloff, S. B., & Lancaster, D. L. (2000). The economics of managing Belding’s ground squirrels in alfalfa in northeastern California. Human Conflicts with Wildlife: Economic Considerations, 104-­108.

Whisson, D., & Salmon, T. (2007). Chapter 12: Integrated management of vertebrate pest in alfalfa. En C. G. Summers & D. Putnam (Eds.), Irrigated alfalfa management in mediterranean.

Published

2021-07-14

How to Cite

Álamo Iriarte, A. P., Cid, F. D., Sosa, R. A., & Bernardos, J. N. (2021). Human perceptions and attitudes in the production of alfalfa under irrigation in La Pampa, Argentina. Semiárida, 31(2), 33–44. Retrieved from https://ojs.unlpam.edu.ar/index.php/semiarida/article/view/6001

Issue

Section

Artículos Científicos y Técnicos